But is this impersonalization actually something good or bad? Well, the web allows us to do such things anytime we want. There are no early closing days, nor are we dependent on any (public) transportation to get there. And especially when purchasing specific things, you don’t want others to see you buying or when doing specific other things, you would like to keep your little secret, the web gives you the desired privacy – at least towards your direct social contacts, if you still use to have any. Sorry for the sarcasm.

However, the downside of all this luxury is the desocialization of people, especially of those, who already had problems integrating and maintaining social contacts. Nowadays you could survive for years within your own home, only taking a step out of your door to throw away the trash. But is this how the future will look? Will groups of people maybe bulkhead themselves from social life? I don’t know, but I hope, that modern technologies won’t ever be abused this way.

Personally, I see companies like PayPal or Amazon as an easement for my everyday life. They save me time by providing me such services. Valuable time. Time I can spend on other things. For example, on playing a round of cards, heh. But even those leisure sites like PartyCasino bring me possibilities I wouldn’t have without them. There is no real Casino around me within miles. Nor is there a tennis court. At that point, the Web 2.0 doesn’t lead to desocialization, but instead it allows me to do things, I wouldn’t be able to do at all without it. To me, modern technology is cool – as long, as it’s not abused in any kind.

Okay, enough hot air. So what is it really? wirecurl.com just launched in the past few days after a while of planning and doing and other stuff to handle. With wirecurl.com, Andreas and me try to establish a web magazine that’s a bit more than just one of those regular “We write reviews of iPhone Apps” or “We test cool new websites and show them to you” sites. It’s more about the whole “2.0″ topic, from the web, over entertainment up to lifestyle and other sort of things. Currently, we’re having a hard time to fill up wirecurl.com with content and yet, there’s unfortunately still not that much to see – but we’re working hard to catch up and present you content you might be interested in.

I’m not going to annoy you losing too many words on this, but one thing I’d still like to mention: To sweeten you the launch, we already reviewed a brand new and yet barely known iPhone & iPad App named Flight+, and we’re giving away the App for free! Just check it out on wirecurl.com!

Hope you’ll stick with us and enjoy reading.

So, what’s it about? Some of you (probably the majority of Apple customers) might have heard about “Things”, an “Getting Things Done” (GTD) application suite contained of an Mac App, an iPhone App and an iPad App that let’s you organize tasks and projects for yourself. Several years ago, the developing company CulturedCode won the Apple Design Award with their pretty neat desktop application. Thanks to my buddy Andreas, who bought me my Things for Mac license in 2009 as a birthday present, I started using the software from it’s quite early 1.x phase. I really loved the application, especially because of its clean and simple design and its ease of use. After quite a while my needs started to change, though. I wanted to have both of my Macs in sync, for example. I played around with Dropbox and found a way to do that, although it didn’t allow me to have Things on both machines open at the same time. Soon, more and more people started writing about how they’d love synchronization features for things, especially OTA (“Over the Air”) sync. And CulturedCode reacted. In mid 2009 they already published a roadmap that was “not a roadmap” and wrote about them having worked since the beginning of that year on a “really sweet” OTA solution that should be better than the competitors’ products.

This means, they actually announced their work on an OTA feature in mid 2009 with the additional info, that they’ve been working already for around 8 months on it. The people who read that and don’t really know about usual timelines for such big IT projects might expect a solution to finally be there in a couple of weeks or maybe months, especially after reading a sentence like this:

Okay, those fanboys and Mac addicts who can’t wait for such kind of delicious features now got pretty aroused and everyone else (especially the people who haven’t spent around 40 bucks on a Things license plus another eight bucks on Things for iPhone so far) really started considering Things as serious solution for their task-planning needs.

Then, till April 2010, CulturedCode didn’t blog about anything related to sync at all. From August 2009 till April 2010, that’s nearly one year without letting users actually know what happened to OTA sync. Meanwhile, many people spent their money on Things, mostly because they trusted in CulturedCode and it’s blog post announcing their work on OTA sync in 2009. And yeah, they haven’t heard about the sync feature for quite a while, but still they saw that progress was made in other areas, so there was not much of a reason to think of CulturedCode being dead or something. Especially, after reading their follow ups about the team growth, people thought, “Eh, it can’t take that long anymore!”.

In the meantime, I became responsible for handling the Mac infrastructure at my employer. For me, it was pretty clear what solution I would be deploying on people’s MacBooks when they’ve been asking me for some GTD application. I thought of Things as a solid and reliable application and the fact that CulturedCode was a Stuttgart-based company made it even more attractive for me to order a volume-license for Things.

People were getting hungry about the OTA sync feature and I guess CulturedCode really saw a need to act, so in December 2010 (8 months later) they released it. Oh, no, not the OTA sync feature, I’m sorry. They released the first chapter of a set of blog posts regarding the OTA sync feature: State of Sync, Part 1. Instead of providing a first beta, what would be appropriate after theoretically 2 years of work, they provided information about general problems on OTA/Cloud synchronization and some nicely drawn wallpapers for your Mac, your iPhone and even your iPad. Hurray to the design department. But people didn’t yell at CulturedCode, not even after 2 years of waiting. Instead, comments like those were written:

This is what I’d call loyal customers.

However, in January, the second post about the “State of Sync” was published. It looked like there was at least some thinking and progressing on the OTA sync feature. Even if it’s not really what customers expected after over two years of development. In March, CulturedCode released part 3 of their blog odyssey, introducing a sign-up for for Cloud sync beta. Hurray, people could sign up and had to wait for the Beta to start. So they did and nearly two months later the first couple of users got approved as beta users and received the testing instructions. Unfortunately, Cloud sync was only available for Things for Mac at that time. It took the CulturedCode people nearly one year to introduce Cloud sync (beta) on iOS! By that time, other products like Wunderlist, that already provided OTA sync attracted more and more former Things users. For new users it was super-attractive too, since they didn’t charge 40 bucks for their desktop client. Actually they didn’t charge for anything. It has just been there. Free to use.

Existing CulturedCode customers became pretty sad or angry or let’s just call it pissed. Pissed about the fact that they still don’t have a fully working cloud sync solution. Pissed about the fact that they spent 40 bucks on a Mac software, maybe 8 bucks on an iPhone App and maybe even 15 bucks on an iPad App. For what? Yeah sure, you’re not buying software for what it might become, you’re buying software for what it is, I know. But let’s be honest, even Andy Potion, who’s pretty much a one-man-show, did a quicker job with The Hit List, in comparison to CulturedCode’s timeline. And not to mention that not too long ago, the creators of Wunderlist – 6Wunderkinder – just launched their new, web based Wunderkit service, that introduces collaboration. And by “collaboration”, I don’t mean the “I’m creating sidebar entries ouf of my Address Book information and drag Tasks onto them to remind myself who’s in charge, without any functionality of actually really letting the people know that they’re in charge”-CulturedCode-collaboration. I mean real collaboration, where you get notified about tasks that have been assigned to you. And it’s web based, too. And there are Apps for it. And it’s even free of charge. And all that it probably half the time CulturedCode had. So, let’s be serious: You do not buy software, for what it might become, but in consideration of such heavy-armed competition, you’d expect the developer to hurry the flock up!

Suddenly, people began to realize all that and the five-star ratings on the App Store became one-star ratings:

People got fed up and CulturedCode became quiet. Not much response on people’s angry tweets to calm them down, no more information about the actual progress, nothing. One possible response could have been to slash the prices on their software for a limited time, to allow existing customers to extend their suite. Another would have been spreading coupon codes for Things for iPhone or Things for iPad. They could have teamed up with several reviewing sites to get media attention on their existing products and their existing features. I mean, after all it still is a beautiful product. It might be over-priced, it might be slow in development and it might not support features that should be mandatory for a 2012 GTD application suite, but still it’s a good piece of software and the jobs it can do, it does extremely well. Unfortunately, CulturedCode has let the users put the focus too much on features they were clearly unable to deliver in an realistic amount of time. There was progress on Things, even if it wasn’t that much, but there was and still is – unfortunately this progress drowned in the OTA-sync-well created by the users. On one hand, CulturedCode had to respond somehow, on the other, they probably wanted to get themselves a bit more time, just a bit more time. In my opinion, their response was influenced too much by their user’s pressure and I got the feeling, that they did not respond because they felt the urge to provide information about what’s going on. The blog posts were nicely written and had some very cool drawings, still it’s not what the users actually wanted. They didn’t want to read philosophical posts about Cloud synchronization or comparisons between MobileMe and Dropbox. And I believe, that, if CulturedCode would have provided more information about OTA (and their other internal project / development progress) without users permanently requesting it via Twitter, E-Mail or even App Store reviews, the whole situation would look way more relaxed these days. I think in general it’s pretty simple to say: Either you try to make your internal development process more transparent to your customers, so they can get a feeling for what to expect and when, or you do it the Apple-way and shut the f*ck up until it’s ready. You don’t get people excited about a feature and let them wait three years for a first beta.

However, in February of this year CulturedCode started their public beta of Things Cloud, so now everyone can at least get a taste for what is probably going to be released someday. Still, people are mad, because rudimentary features like task-notifications don’t work so far – IT guys understand, that it’s pretty hard to notify the user about content you might not even have available on the specific device, regular people instead just get the impression that Things now stars getting OTA sync, but loses existing features for that, what’s a bit unsatisfying.

I had a testdrive account for their private beta and used (and sometimes still use) it – and I liked what I saw, to be honest. Still, I moved over to another solution, just because from my current point of view it integrates better with what’s important to me and costs less, due to the fact that the desktop client is built into OS X (Calendar) and the iPhone/iPad client is one universal binary, priced at something around three bucks. The app developer answers pretty quickly to questions, even via Twitter and customers are being involved right into the development progress, by asking about their preferences regarding certain, to-be-implemented features via Facebook and other modern social media. I mean, come on, it’s not that hard: If you follow some simple rules and strategies, customers will stay loyal at any time, no matter how delayed a long-awaited feature might be. I think, that one of CulturedCode’s biggest problems was and has always been the direct communication. I personally see them like people have probably seen Microsoft several years a ago: A big and massive brick where customers can’t really reach someone that has an open ear for their thoughts and their wishes. A machinery that produces software the way it thinks its best for the customer, without involving him in that progress. But we’re not talking about huge corporations with a super-huge user-base here!

Well, anyway, at last but not least, I would like to lose some words about direct communication to the customer. I’m not the person that posts Steve Jobs’ emails on my blog – not that I would have ever gotten any – and therefor I’m not going to post the details about my email conversation with Jürgen Schweizer, one of the CEOs of CulturedCode, here. Instead, I just want to talk about the feeling I had during that conversation. It started with a tweet from a guy I actually don’t know, complaining about – you might guess it – Things’ missing OTA feature. He had a short conversation with CulturedCode on Twitter about that and I got into it to confirm the points he made, since I found them totally true and understandable. I ended up writing a mail to Jürgen Schweizer, to answer some direct messages he sent me via Twitter. In my opinion, the mail was polite and reflecting the way I (and many other customers) felt at that time. No bitching, no screaming, just some honest feedback from one of their users. What I got back instead was a mail, that truly made me feel a bit stupid and uncomfortable. I was a bit disappointed, about the way a CEO writes to one of his paying customers and intentionally makes him feel, like he has been writing something he should feel bad about. This is not the feeling you’d expect from a representing person of a company, regardless of how rude the customer might have been. You don’t indirectly tell the customer, that he (and/or other users) are disrespectful. Never. It’s a paying customer who actually supports your product through buying it – and even if this customer should get sad, angry or really mad and no matter how upset or uncomfortable you are with the things he’s been writing you, it’s in your responsibility to always keep the conversation at a level where you can point out your view without indirectly making the customer feel insulted or whatever. It’s useless to try to argue, who’s wrong or right with a customer – in the end, the only thing that matters is, that people get the feeling, that this company cares about its customers and really wants their products to make them happy. It’s always bad, when a company’s way of leading conversation makes their customers get a negative feeling.
For example: Some while ago, I’ve downloaded a movie via iTunes on my MacBook. Later, I wanted to watch it on my iMac, so I transferred it to to my iPhone (because that’s the only way I knew) and from there I tried to transfer it to my iMac. Unfortunately, it didn’t work out and I lost the movie, literally. The file was gone somehow and I could not re-download it at that time. I called the Apple Support and told them, what I tried to do and that I found it pretty meh anyway, that there was no other possibility to get a movie from my MacBook to my iMac. Now, the Apple Support could have told me, that I was trying to do something that was not intended by Apple to be done and made me feel really stupid by that and leave me alone with my transfer problem. Or they could have provided me a way, to download the movie again on my iMac, so I could watch it there. Or they could have just hung up. But instead, the support guy on the other side added a credit for watching two movies of any kind from the iTunes Store for free, just because of the inconvenience caused. And see there, the customer was happy. I bitched about the fact that there was no possibility to simply transfer the movie from one Mac to another, but in the end, Apple just made up for that by allowing me to download the movie again plus watch another movie – for free! This is, what I call customer relationship. The customer is not an enemy threatening you with feature-requests, he’s the nice guy from vis-à-vis who loves your product that much, that he agreed on giving you a part – even if it’s just a small part – of the money he has been working for so hard, just to give you the opportunity to continue developing such a great product. So please, companies of this world, treat him like this.

Just my two cents. Thank you for reading.

At home, I browsed a bit the internet for that song and stumbled upon a version of the song that might be even better than the original. Check out JoeySuki’s remix:

Very nice track!

First of all: Hell, yeah! iTunes Cloud finally removed the pain and anger brought by Apple’s policy of having an iPod Touch/iPhone only linked with one iTunes Library. For me, it has always been a pain to synchronize my music in a smooth way all over my devices (iMac, MacBook, iPhone), especially when it came to MP3s. The fact that iTunes didn’t consider MP3s when using “transfer purchases” took any chance (except of using “Home Sharing”) to get MP3s synchronized all over. With iTunes content I permanently had to go that way: Buy them on my iPhone, connect the phone to my iMac when I was at home, “transfer purchases”, reconnect the iPhone to my MacBook when I was at work, “transfer purchases”, all done. But with MP3s this didn’t work.

Now thanks to iTunes Match and iTunes Cloud, MP3s are being matched to actual iTunes Store content and, if nothing could be found, the MP3s are being uploaded to the cloud, from where they can be streamed/downloaded to all registered devices. Sounds awesome, huh?

Well, actually, it really is awesome. There are some downsides, for example the *very* slow iTunes Match servers for uploading data. I’m not sure if that’s only because of the instant heavy load that recently hit the servers or if Apple just didn’t spend enough money for the server’s to be the dog’s balls. Anyhow, besides of that everything runs just fine so far. Streaming/downloading works with good speed (no endless seconds of buffering, nor interrupts while playing), artwork yet seems to be a little problem since here it doesn’t seem to get synchronized instantly all over my devices and the iTunes Match recognition works okay (only have/had to upload around 1k songs of nearly 5k).

The only thing that really bothers me is the fact that my iPhone actually gets flooded with music and the only way I found to remove recently “streamed” (or “streamed and automatically downloaded) music is by scrolling through my list with nearly 5k rows and swipe-to-remove each song I’d like not to have on my iPhone anymore, so I can use the 16GB for more than just audio.

It would be really nice if someone could point me a better solution to fix that issue or, if there is none, if Apple could please implement a feature that allows me to “clear the least played songs”.

Oh well.

Seen on the german A8.

(just wanted to have that said)

It’s a hardware-unlocked model I bought from a shop on the first of February 2010, it’s in best condition (as the pictures show) and I even ship it within its original packing plus the bill (so you even have warranty left on it). I’m actually only intending to ship it within Germany. For more information, just read the description of the eBay auction.

Good luck bidding!

Fast forward to today and the Smartphones we’re using in our everyday life – Blackberries, Pres and Pixies, iPhones and N900s. What’s the biggest part in that whole cellular phone market that changed since the mid/end 90s? Of course, it’s the phone’s technology and the features they provide nowadays. But what’s more important, the whole accessories-ecosystem around those phones actually changed. Today, you see people buying additional battery-packs for their Blackberries, since the phones are already that “Smart” that you’d actually need a constant power-source to make them last for more than a couple of hours of heavy usage. When people buy a mobile phone, they also typically throw some on-the-go charger into the bucket. And maybe also some docking-station for the desk, or even equipment for attaching it to their car’s windshields.

Now the whole accessory-ecosystem goes that far, that people even buy overpriced socks or pieces of silicon formed as protection-sleeve for their Smartphones. Especially within the iPhone user-groups you can see such protection-cases being very popular. But let us look from another perspective at especially those accessories.

When someone buys an iPhone, of course, he’s interested in the phone’s features and probably likes the way the phone integrates with the rest of his personal infrastructure, like laptops, computers/Macs, etc. But of course, only a few people really go for the features-pack only. Probably 90% of the iPhone customers look forward to have a phone that’s so exclusive and so beautiful that you’d hardly like to take it out of the showcase. And exactly at that point, all third-party manufacturers of iPhone accessories come in handy. So, people go and get their iPhones, take them out of the packing and lock them right into some ugly silicon, acrylic, plastic or whatever kind of case to protect their beauty against scratches, dirt and other natural enemies of the glossy piano paint. Sure, I mean, they paid and ass full of money for a brick that blinds you by its glint, so why should these people not try the best to protect it the best they can?

Well, sure they can do that – but where’s the point? I think I can talk for everyone that has ever searched for an iPhone case when I say that 99% of them are ugly as hell and not worth the package they’re shipped in. So, why do people then actually buy an iPhone for its cool look, when they “protect” it most of the time with such a case where the phone’s actual look does not matter anymore? For what? So they can slide it out when they’re feeling lucky and show it to everybody for one blink of an eye and then pack it back into its sleeve?

Of course, you can’t blame the people for that. I mean, why can’t accessory-manufacturers produce electro-magnetic protection shields that build an own atmosphere around the iPhone that does not allow anything else to come through than the owner’s washed hands to touch the touchscreen? I mean come on, that’s what people are waiting for! F*ck invisibleSHIELD, f*ck the pseudo translucent plastic shields that doesn’t absorb hits that could cause the iPhone’s screen to break into million small pieces. The people want cases that doesn’t even allow the iPhone to fall down the stairs or into water!

Yeah, right. Now I can definitely remember those days when I got my first Bosch 509 and protected it with one of the dozen plastic-sleeves against the cruel reality.

Think different, people.

Enjoy!

However, I could philosophize even more about the pros and cons of this themeable-web-interface-for-YQL but I’m actually not that much into it to do so. The reason for registering was mainly for the hype’s sake and besides, I actually planned to reserve my everywhere used nickname “devilx” – unfortunately it was already taken by an as-it-seems porn addicted guy.
If this guy should coincidentally follow my blog and read this: I would be very thankful, if you could pass me that subdomain name, so I can make use of it for more than just an empty page named “Default” and following porn. Thank you!

Oh well, enough for today. Read (someday) more on http://mariusmm.tumblr.com/. Enjoy!

CandyBar makes OS X appear even more lickable than it already is. It allows to simply change each application’s icon and provides a cool management of all the available icon-sets. Besides, also the Dock appearance can be tweaked and managed. It would be really nice, if CandyBar would provide a way to sync the collection from one Mac to another, since now, I need to keep my collections on my iMac and my MacBook manually in sync, what’s pretty meh. However,  although it’s pretty pricy, it’s worth to have it.

Colloquy is the most advanced, free IRC client I’ve found yet. Its feature-list is pretty good and there’s a similar iPhone client available, too. I used this client already in 2006, when I still had my PowerBook and have to say, that it’s pretty bloated and slow on older hardware. But on the current generation of MacBooks, iMacs and MacPros it should be running like a charm.

Width Dropbox you can easily keep your files in sync over two or more different devices, regardless if it’s a PC, a Mac, a Linux or even an iPhone – all your data is always up-to-date. Besides, you can share files with friends and receive shared folder invitations yourself. 2GB of space is being provided for free, more is affordable for some cash. Though, I’d never put sensitive data “into the cloud”.

Echofon is probably the best Twitter-suite available on the Mac and the iPhone. Thanks to their Sync- and Push-Notification-Service it’s a pleasure to use Twitter, even with multiple accounts and on multiple devices. Thanks to the intelligent Sync-Service, Echofon notices when you’re not on your desktop anymore, and starts pushing notifications to your iPhone client when you get mentioned by someone else – very cool! Yet, the notifications will be pushed only every 15 minutes, but from what I’ve heard, the Echofon guys are already working on shrinking this interval. If you haven’t tried out yet – be sure to do soon!

Is there much to say about iPhoto? I think you can call it the image-management application on OS X. Since ’09 it also supports Faces & Places, what makes everything even more sexy. In combination with the photos shot on a GPS-able camera (like the iPhone) it even detects automatically, what place you’ve taken the photo. Although, yet the face-recognition doesn’t work as I would expect it to. You need high quality pictures with much contrast to get iPhoto recognize the people.

I used to be registered on Last.fm since I was using Linux with its Media-Players with Audioscrobbler plugin, so I’ve just continued using this pretty cool service. It let’s me tag the music I listen and discover new tracks I might like. I never tried out Pandora or similar services, so I can’t say whether Last.fm is better or not – I’m just used to it.

After discovering and trying out LaunchBar there was no way around it anymore – not even by using QuickSilver, what I did quite some time. LaunchBar is extremely fast, supports a ton of different Applications and even provides an easy way to write and include your own plugins. I wouldn’t want to miss it again in my daily work.

LittleSnapper in combination with its web-service (former QuickSnapper, now Ember) is a very nice enhancement to the OS X desktop, since it provides a very quick and easy way to share screenshots with others, without having to use “Grab” and manually upload the images to some service like ImageShack. In addition to the Desktop client, I also use the iPhone app to share camera-snapshots with others.

With Money managing finances became as easy as a finger-snip. I bought my license on a MacUpdate Promo for 20% less and have to say that it’s worth every penny, especially when there’s such a friendly and helpful company like Jumsoft behind. Money supports backing up the whole database to MobileMe and by that even synchronization of two Macs with each other. The iPhone client yet only supports sync over WiFi from what I’ve seen, but hopefully there will be MobileMe support in future, too.

Let me just call it “Poor man’s Photoshop” – in an excellent way! Pixelmator is, what GIMP is to the GNOME Desktop. It let’s me create/edit images in an easy and smooth way, without much knowledge of the actual application itself. Pixelmator provides me a light and intuitive application with a feature-list that fits my needs perfectly without being over-bloated.

As the name already says, Quiet Read provides you a way to temporary bookmark for example web-pages and read it later, when there’s more time for it. It’s actually the similar concept Instapaper follows, although it doesn’t really extract your site’s content for any mobile platform, nor does it have any web-service in the background to which you can sync multiple installations. MobileMe support would be a great feature, maybe Bamboo Apps will implement it some day.

Shovebox is a great companion for Things and Quiet Read which also provides a pretty cool iPhone client that’s for free. I got the App itself from within a MacHeist Bundle, where I didn’t need to pay anything for it – and maybe that’s the reason I’m actually using it. Yet, I would not really pay money on this App, since its yet pretty “small” (regarding its features) and I have most things already managed by Things and Quiet Read/Instapaper (free).

Yes, it’s Telephone! And yes! It’s OpenSource! This application allows you to use your VoIP account provided by your ISP directly on your Mac. At the moment, several ISP are supported and the list gets longer and longer. Telephone makes it easy to dial and receive calls on a VoIP account without much hassle.

TextMate – THE Editor. I think, there’s nothing better for writing any kind of code under OS X. This editor is light, fast and provides hell of a feature-set you’ll probably never finish to explore. MacroMates did an excellent job with this application and I know of many tries (especially on Linux) to re-create something similar, but yet no other (GUI-)editor reached TextMate.

Things is probably one of the most amazing task management applications for OS X available today. It provides all you need for successfully managing all your ToDos and even syncs them up to your iPhone client. Two big cons of Things are the yet still not available MobileMe sync (today, it does sync only over WiFi, without even using an encrypted connection) and the pricing on both, the desktop and the iPhone app. Still, the App is just lo-ve-ly and a must of everyone who’s really into task management.

A very nice newsfeed reader with excellent graphical user interface. Times provides you all basic-features you would expect form an RSS-reader plus the possibility to read the whole articles within the application itself. Very nice idea, and pretty cool implementation, though I’d wish it to be faster and not that bloated.

Versions – and you’ll never need to look up svn –help again. Since the last version of Version (ough, what a sentence) it even supports the latest SVN 1.6.x and provides you to work with several different SVN repositories at a time without much practice. Although, with $39 it this application is very pricy.

Viscosity is yet the best user interface for OpenVPN available on OS X, in my opinion. It lets you import your OpenVPN config-files and edit them within a very nice preference-window. Also, it shows you statistics about your running connections and makes OpenVPN easier than it already is – and with $9 it’s quite a fair deal.

Storing passwords, credit-card information and other sensitive data. Wallet allows me to manage all my logins and other passwords in a very nice and fast way, it provides me an add-on for Safari and Firefox and it allows me to sync my Wallet-database via MobileMe and even browse it on my iPhone with its iPhone app – although it took years until the iPhone pendant was available here in germany.

I think, that’s it so far. Besides those application, of course I use the regular tools like Mail.app, iCal, the Address Book, iTunes, the Terminal and all the other not-worth-mentioning programs that come with OS X.

Palm Pre Development Bundle 0.2

Yes, after not even four hours I’ve already finished building the 0.2-release of my Palm Pre Development Bundle for TextMate. In case you’re wondering what weird stuff I’m talking about, please read my previous post first.

However, this second release includes a lot more features than it had before, plus I’ve made use of the CocoaDialog now. Let me describe the new features from the top to the bottom of the screenshot on the left site.

First of all, there’s “Generate New Project”. This lets you execute a palm-generate with all important attributes and opens the created project afterwards using the “mate” terminal-command, which needs to be available for this to work. All you have to do then is simply to save the TextMate project right into your generated project-directory.

Next, we still have “Generate New Scene”. I’ve enhanced the feature now, so that you’ll get a cocoa dialog asking for the scene’s name. Beware: The generation usually works as it should, the only problem is the TextMate project-drawer, which doesn’t seem to refresh by itself. A workaround: Cmd+H to hide TextMate and then click on its Dock-icon to make it appear again. Then all newly generated files should be visible in its drawer.

The next three features work just as before, no enhancements at all. On the fourth, the “Launch Project in Debugging-Mode” feature, I’ve implemented a palm-launch with debugging options, that can be run on an existing, packaged and installed project.

Next, there are ways to close and remove installed Projects. “Close running project” of course only works, when the App is actually running and “Remove installed Project” removes the App from the device. As device for all those commands the first device found by the Palm toolset will be taken – so if you would like to use the Emulator, better disconnect your real device and vice versa.

I’ve also built-in two features that let you simulate test calls and SMS on your Emulator, if you changed from password authentication to SSH public key authentication. You can do this either manually or try to use the feature at the menu’s bottom named “Auto-install SSH-Pubkey on Emulator”. Depending on your SSH-key-setup it works out or… not.

The other seven features allow you to simulate GPS drives on the Emulator – again only if you’ve set-up SSH-Pubkey authentication.

I hope you enjoy this release of the Palm Pre Development Bundle for TextMate!

Download: Palm-Pre-Bundle-0.2

UPDATE: There’s a newer version available! Get it here. Or use GitHub.

The scene generation works like this: You implement your this.controller.pushScene(“Main”);-statement, select the scene’s name (Main, without the quotes!) and select the scene-generation command from the bundle’s menu. The command will immediately generate you a new scene named just the way you chose to name it.

The other three commands can be ran by pressing the keys Fn+Ctrl+F5/F6/F7. Attention: The bundle only works with TextMate Projects! Generate your Palm Pre project like you always do, by using the following command:

palm-generate -p “{ title:’ProjectName’, id:com.my.ProjectName, version:’1.0.0′ }” ProjectName

Then, create a new TextMate Project and drag&drop the folder palm-generate created for you (“ProjectName”) into the Project’s drawer. Save the project within your Project-directory (“ProjectName”) and then run the commands.

This is the very first version of this bundle and I’ll keep constantly improving it with other features that help me and hopefully others on the development of Palm Pre Web-Apps.

Enjoy!

Download: PalmPre-Bundle-0.1

UPDATE: There’s a newer version available now! Get it here.

However, after I bought Money, I exported my whole transaction info from my ING-DiBa account as CSV (since they do not provide me anything else) and tried to import it into Money – and it failed. I was using the latest version (3.4.4 v1938) and had quite a few problems with the CSV import. First of all, the columns haven’t been recognized automatically. Also, I didn’t really knew how to import the transaction-value, since I only had one column containing a positive (income) or a negative (outgoing) number, where Money expected “Withdrawal” and “Deposit”. Also, Money seemed to have problems with the punctuation of the numbers, what cause 1000€ to become 100€. And in general, the software didn’t work well with the CSV my bank provided me. I had to manually cut out the first few lines (which were just some additional information but not party of the transactions) and stuff line that. I was wondering, why this is so, since Squirrel automatically recognized the CSV and imported it just perfectly into my virtual account.

I wrote an e-mail to Jumsoft and explained the problems I have with my freshly purchased Money and of course asked for help. After some more mailing, I got a patched version of Money one day later. I tried it out and: Bam! It worked! The CSV imports work just as they should now, even if there’s still no automatic column recognition. Still, I’m very happy that Jumsoft helped my out that fast and in such an uncomplicated way – I’m not used to this from Apple-related companies anymore.

After I had all my data imported into Money and got everything categorized, synced the info up to my iPhone, what also worked out as smooth as I’d expect it.

The one thing I did not check yet are the possibilities to sync Money over two different Macs. I’m sure it’s possible by using the Dropbox-way, although I would not like to upload such sensitive information to my Dropbox. Maybe it’s possible to sync via W-LAN, dunno.

It seems to be possible to sync different Macs via MobileMe! Hurray! I’ll test it out and give some feedback as soon as possible.

Enjoy viewing!

Facepalm

For the past months now already I’m searching for a new desktop table, since my actual one is now already eleven years old and getting more and more ramshackly by each day passing. I’ve been at several furniture stores around me, including (of course) IKEA, Möbel Gamerdinger, Heyne Büromarkt, any some more. Also, I’ve been searching for tables on the internet at several different online-stores and even found quite a few tables that really fit my needs. The only thing that didn’t fit on any of the desks I liked was their pricing – and I really can’t understand how this could be.

What’s a desk typically contained of? Well, mostly, one big plate – in my case some rectangle one with for example 180cm x 80cm and legs, usually four in number. And actually this is essentially everything I want and need. If you would now stumble through the different (online-)stores and search for exactly such a table, you would probably be shockingly disturbed by the prices furniture stores charge for one piece of wood with four legs. Let’s take IKEA as example: They charge 179,00€ for a Galant Desktop-Table (160cm x 80cm), which is essentially only four table-legs, mounted beneath a frame which holds a plate made of pressboard – sold as a mass-production article, where the costs for fabrication probably are way under a quarter of the price they charge. Besides, at least the demonstration desks within the IKEA store were so shaky, because of their cheap built-up, that I wouldn’t want to have my iMac placed onto one of those, until I’d like to buy new hard drives every few weeks. And at last but not least: The way the table looks can hardly be called “design”.

Next store, same issue. Poorly designed desks made of cheap materials, ugly fabrication but prices within the range from two-hundred to five-hundred or even more Euros. And all I was thinking was “What’s the point?!” – there is no relation between the quality of those mass-produced tables and their prices. Don’t get me wrong, of course a lot of costs for crafting, producing, transportation and more come together – and I might not even bitch that loud if at least the materials they would use would have been real wood plates and solid steel-frames and -legs – but especially in those days I can’t see any relation between the price and the quality of those products. In my opinion, furniture stores achieved a status where they can just pull out the customer’s money off their pockets with nobody complaining about it. When some hardware producer prices its products at extremely exaggerated values you hear blogs and news-sites complaining about it. Why don’t they do so with furnitures? Are furniture-stores/-producers now already on the same level with car manufacturers and the music industry? For me, it seems so.

However, since I’m a person which works at his desk a very large amount of time and wants to feel comfortable while doing so, I’ve decided to not buy any of those mass-production-crap-desks for myself. Instead, I’m looking forward at desktops like Sublevel’s iDesk or Holmris’ Milk. Both of those tables are made of qualitatively high materials to assure stability and both look just gorgeous. Of course, those desktops are priced at a totally different level, although there’s one difference that should be kept clearly in mind: Those are no mass-products. Those desktops are custom design work, containing innovative and practical features.

I’ve already received the price listings for the different version of Milk and will yet keep looking around for a bit more, until I’ve found the table I really really really want.

Update: Yesterday I finally got a desktop table, although it was more like a spontaneous buy. I purchased the Galant table I was talking about, with the A-legs and, instead of a crappy wooden-plate, a gorgeous black glass one. For the whole table I paid around two-hundred bucks in total, what now really is a good price. Why I’m thinking so? Well, instead of the cheap and ugly want-to-be-real-wood plate I got a piece of glass which usually costs nearly two-hundred bucks itself, plus a half-way-solid frame with chrome legs that fit together pretty good. I’ve mounted the desk and yet, as I’ve expected, I’m experiencing “shocks” thru vibrations of the objects lying on the table (lamp, iMac, etc), but I’ve already found a way to screw the table’s frame to the wall behind, in an unobvious and clean way, to reduce the vibrations on the table itself. So, as I’ve said before, the table’s frame was not worth one penny, unfortunately there was no other way for me to get the glass-plate lifted to 70cm (or more) – besides building myself an own frame.

Also Still, I hope the furniture stores/industry to suffer from the depression just like the automobile industry has (and will continue to), so maybe the thinking there will change in a way to provide the people prices that fit the actual product’s quality/value someday.

An annoyed and disappointed goodbye for now.

I’ve been working on a web-site that used the jQuery framework to render content on the client side and get information from its back-end, via XmlHttpRequests. The whole built-up worked just fine of every modern, popular browser available in the market – like the Firefox, Internet Explorer or Safari (on the Mac platform). Now, I had to test the site and make it workable on the iPhone-plattform as well. The site itself uses OAuth as authentication method and provides the information within a HTTP-header named “Authorization”. The theory is pretty plain: The back-end receives a request, checks for this header and responses accordingly.

However, iPhone’s Safari didn’t behave like the other browsers did. For whatever reason, the XHR was sent to the back-end, including every header that was set on the JavaScript side – except the “Authorization”-header. First, I though that Safari maybe could not handle the parameters of this header, but when I just renamed the setRequestHeader-argument to “Auth”, it worked. It simply just worked.

This happening made me search for other users experiencing this problem, unfortunately there doesn’t really seem to be many users testing JavaScript-sites on their iPhone – to be more precise, I did not find one result on Google that describes the problem I’m experiencing. I though, “Oh well, why not call Apple’s Technical Support?” – bad mistake. I got connected to a very annoyed and stroppy telephone-support which tried to convince me, that the iPhone’s Safari yet does not support Java. When I repeated myself by saying “It’s about JavaScript“, he didn’t really make the impression to understand the difference. I told him what the actual scenario was and all I got as answer was “Fill out the Feedback form on Apple’s site”. This made me a bit angry, because I more and more got the feeling of him trying to simply get rid of me. I asked for someone who is more technically involved into the whole iPhone stuff and he answered with “You’re already calling the most-advanced technical support – there’s no way to go further!”. At this point total disappointment overcame me and the only thing I thought of saying before I would hang-up the phone was “FAIL!” – luckily I was behaving more polite than the support-guy himself. Eh.

The end of the story is, that I (once again) wrote a report via Apple’s Feedback form (which from my impression is saving the submitted content to /dev/null) and implemented a workaround for myself by renaming the “Authorization”-header to “Auth”. Yet again a scenario in which I’m feeling like talking to a wall of bricks and have no possibility to get any information regarding my problem or maybe even correct this sort of bug. I think, this is the other side of closed-source software.

Google Wave Dev Preview

I can happily announce (or brag :-P) that I’ve just received my Google Wave invitation today and already created my account. I’m really excited of exploring and developing on Google’s Wave, especially with the ideas I already have in mind. Yet, I just clicked around a bit, due to the lack of free time, but as soon as I can I will take a deeper look at the API and try out some stuff I might even publish here. So stay tuned to see read (and maybe see) the latest progress of my Wavealicious ideas/implementations.

Btw, you can contact me on Wave via devilx@wavesandbox.com.

First of all, the App Store is great. From its theory to its practice, everything is implemented just the way it has to be. Sure, sometimes it’s a little slow and not that responsible as one would expect, but altogether the browsing experience is really great. Why? Because it has to be. Nobody likes to spend money somewhere he doesn’t enjoy browsing for things – regardless whether we’re talking about the #real-life or in virtual. It’s just fun to look through the Apps, find new ones, share them with your friends and of course buy them. And it’s so easy as well. One click, that’s all! Isn’t that just great?

Oh well, yeah, it would be – if. If Apple would have kept the essential concept of their App Store the way they actually planned and intended it to. I mean, let’s think back, to the time before the Apple App Store was launched (what’s only little over a year ago) – what was the general appearance of existing application stores (of e.g. Nokia or for the Windows Mobile Platform)? Exactly. Ugly, slow, confusing, a lot of useless tra…ehrrr… stuff. And then came Apple – BAM! Brand new App Store for mobile applications. Everything was clean, everything was very well working and simple for the end-user to access. Then ago, the App Store provided a few essential and yet well known applications by third-parties. Great apps, with great functionality that even looked amazingly cool.

But then, after a while, it seems like the whole BAM just BAM-MED even more. And more. And more. Of course, Apple was lucky about this fact – more Apps for sale, more cut-offs for themselves. Why not? And do you know what’s the best? Big numbers. What? Yeah! Just as I said it. Big numbers. From the moment on, from which Apple started literally raping the potential of the App store within every Keynote they presented people could see all those big numbers. Thousands of of Apps. Millions of downloads. Et cetera.

But did this really improve the Store? I’m looking around at this very same moment within the App Store and have to say: No. It didn’t. All it improved was Apple’s pockets and the big numbers on their Keynote presentations. I stumble through the App Store and see hundreds and hundreds of Apps, one more useless than the other – Bikini Babes, Gym Babes, Simple To-Do and of course a huge amount of games. Yeah, games. I’m not saying, that games are “useless” in that way. Sometimes, when waiting for the Bus or for your Girl getting changed you appreciate those little time-consumptions. But come on? I mean, spending more than $2 for a game that won’t last any longer than one hour to be played, thanks to Apple’s gorgeous batteries? Who should play those games? Shall I constantly keep my iPhone attached to the power-cord, so I can play two hours of Need For Speed? Isn’t the whole game stuff, that Apple’s trying to sell as “PSP/NintendoDS Killer” just plain dumb and totally impracticable? I’m not saying, that games on mobile phones are no fun in general, but are you re-charging your iPhone every three hours, just to be able to play some games? I mean, I still don’t understand what market Apple really tries to reach with that. My impression is, that people indeed spend money on games like NFS or Sims 3, but only to be able to show-off at parties or other occasions. I don’t believe anybody really playing (and by playing I mean the very same behavior you hear from 15-years old, Norwegian guys with a World of Warcraft account!) the games on the iPhone. At least not till their end. Also I believe, that 70% of the people buying games use in iPod Touch instead, in addition to their iPhone.

Eh, however. Back to the topic. So, the Apple App Store started providing more and more sh… apps, over the past year. Some, useless ones and also some totally useless ones. Of course, in between of all those crap, you’ll sometimes find a pearl, like for example Shazam, Daylite Touch, Things, LittleSnapper, Colloquy, eBay, Ego, Wallet, Squirrel, Shopper, Deliveries, Weightbot, iStat, Beats, Last.fm, RadAlert and many many more. Apps that really have a use and pay-back for the price you spent on them. Unfortunately, those apps aren’t the majority anymore – and it seems to become worse by each day passing by. So what to do?

Of course Apple could stop selling all those other crappy apps. Just reject when developers submit them – and instead include apps that would be worth including. *cough*GoogleVoice*cough* But to be honest, by that, Apple would shoot into their own feet. Why stop selling crappy apps, when there are enough users to buy them? Why rejecting the cut-off, even if it’s just some pennies per app?

So let’s see, what could be Plan B? Uh yeah. Plan B. Sounds always good. How about.. err.. an “Exclusive App Store”? An App Store exclusively for high-rated and (therefor) pricy apps. Yeah, that sounds good, doesn’t it? But wait… who decides what’s “exclusive”? The developers? The users? Or maybe the price? I don’t know how you think, but I’d probably go with the third option. As long as the price is high enough, I don’t believe Apple caring about the actual application’s quality – not esthetically nor functionally. So, what sense would an exclusive App Store have then? Well, I guess no more than just gather more and more money.

I’m really happy that at least there are Blogs and Sites on the web, which take the enormous job of searching through the App Store, filtering the whole crap away and bringing you the best and most beautiful applications available for your iPhone. Without them, I guess I’d have a hard time to fine *anything* that would fit my needs within the actual App Store – and maybe just switch to Android.

So far.

On August 23rd, I wrote an E-Mail to the SourceForge-Support:

Dear Sir or Madam,

some years (now already ago, I registred on SourceForge.net (Username: devilx) and uploaded some OpenSource-Projects of mine. After a while, my Account has been blocked without any (for me visible) reason. Now, I’m interessted in using this Account again, unfortunately I can’t re-enable it by recovering the password (or else).

I would like to ask, if you could help me re-enable the Account.

Thanks in advance,

bye.

On August 27th, the SourceForge-Support (finally) answered:

Hello Marius,

This account was removed for a policy violation. It may not be
recovered. If you choose to open a new account, please be sure to
closely review our Site Legal documentation (
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sitelegal/wiki ).

Best regards,

Daniel Hinojosa
SourceForge.net Support
sfnet_ops@corp.sourceforge.com

On the very same date, ten minutes later, I wrote back:

Hi Daniel,

thank you for your reply. I don’t know, why I should have violate your policy, since I didn’t do anything wrong on that account. It had been removed shortly after I created a project named “BFC”, what stood for Brainf*ck Compiler. I’m sorry, but it is not my fault for the Programming-Languag being called like that. If you rejected the project because of this fact, it would have been fair. But deleteing my whole account is pretty sad.

I was having some projects running under that account, which seem to be still available. Are there any possibilities for me to get my account named “devilx” (and all the project memberships I had) back?

Thanks in advance,

Marius.

On August 29th the Support wrote back:

Hi,

The account was closed at the time as there was a policy violation. We
won’t be restoring that account.

you may open a new account and if you desire, attempt to take over the
projects. If they are abandoned, this should be very easy to do.

Please be sure to be fully familiar with your Terms of Use:

http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sitelegal/wiki/Terms%20of%20Use

Best regards,

Daniel Hinojosa
SourceForge.net Support
sfnet_ops@corp.sourceforge.com

Half an hour later, I finished the communication:

Great! Say “Hello” to OpenSource and its support – that is, why people buy commercial, closed source products.

Thank you for no help.

Have a nice day.

And yeah, I know, it’s a free service and they have the right to do whatever they would want, blah blah blah. Still, it’s the fact that the support apparently had no idea what the actual problem with my account was nor why it really had been blocked. I’m not going to sign up for a new account, since nowadays there are (luckily) way more possibilities to get your own project hosted in whatever way.

Yet again a poor statement the OpenSource related projects/SourceForge makes.

Cheers!

invisibleSHIELD

Four days ago, I ordered the invisibleSHIELD at the invisibleSHIELD Germany GmbH, which arrived today – though the website told me something about 1 – 2 work-days.

After I got it, I unpacked it and read the sparse held documentation within the packaging about how to put it on my iPhone. I was not sure, whether I understood the few pictures right, so I searched on YouTube for a documentation video and found a couple. I looked at two or three and saw that everyone did it the same: Wash hands, turn iPhone off, clean it, spray hands with the solution shipped with the invisibleSHIELD, spray the foil with the solution, “just put it on the iPhone”, press out the solution from the center to the edges and wait until it dries.

And so I did. The first thing I’ve seen was: It’s a total crap to handle the foil. When it’s wet, you can’t really position it, but if you don’t, it will look odd when it dries. If you finally positioned it the right way and start pulling out the liquid using a credit-card or something else, it repositions again. Oh great. You take it of for several times and put it on again and then you finally have it! The middle dried out, it’s nearly “glued”, it’s good positioned and you can start “glueing” the sides. But now really just says “Hello!” again and you remember, that in real life, there is not room without tiny whiny dust-particles. You look at the already glued center of your foil and see that only half of the dust you see there can be removed – the other half lies beneath. Oh great!

invisibleSHIELD

Since it would totally over-stretch and destroy the foil, if you would take it off again, you just say to yourself “it’s not thaaaaaaat baaaaad” and just keep on going. You try to glue the edges, what seems to be pretty much impossible, since the cuts aren’t physically right done to make the foil bend the way it would need to. So you try and try and try and …. still it doesn’t work. It just doesn’t. However, it already pissed myself, and I thought of taking it off again and sending it back, but I though.. “ghnar, I don’t want an iPhone case!”. So I took a hair-dryer and warmed the edges to make them less restive. After I finally finished the whole thing, Mr. Reality walked by again and said “Hello!” – again, in real life, there’s no room without dust. Because of this, the sticky foil-edges started to look more and more flooded by little particles of dust – even more than usual, since I had to use a dryer to get the foil into the form it needed to have. Ouff.

Altogether, I’m very, very, very disappointed of the result and I’m lucky I’ve searched and found videos showing how to remove the foil again before starting the whole thing. I can’t believe I really paid €19,16 + €3,64 shipment for something like this.

My advice to everyone who would like to protect his iPhone against scratches: Just be careful. Try not to let it fall down or let other things fall onto it. You won’t become happy with such a foil.

I’ve never actually been a fan of jail-breaking the iPhone nor the iPod, since it’s totally controversial. Most people who jail-break their devices think “Why should I just use 10% of what I could really use on that device?!“, though they don’t think twice: Why did they buy an Apple product like the iPhone or the iPod Touch? There are three kind of people who buy these things: The first type are the “cool” people. They like to pay the “Cool Tax” just to be cool themselves and impress other people. “Look how cool my new iPhone is!!!111“. Such people might jail-break, just because they’d like to be able to say “Oh well, sure, you got an iPhone, too, but look what mine has, that yours doesn’t!!!111“.

The second kind of people, jail-break their iDevices because they can. That’s it. Nothing more. These people are usually some people with more interest into technology, which just have fun doing such things. “Look, my iPhone runs an SSH session! And look, on my Xbox I have a media-center that looks just like Apple TV but has way more features. For free! And oh, my PSP runs Linux!!“. Those people in general do stuff like this because they enjoy it and don’t really much care of the device’s functionality. They don’t care if they won’t be able to play any games on their PSP anymore, they don’t care if they lose their rest-warranty on their Xbox and they don’t care if they won’t be able to read any e-mails on their iPhones anymore. They just don’t care, if it works properly (without hacking) or not.

What brings me to the third kind of people. Those buy products like the ones from Apple mainly because of one important reason: It simply works! You turn it on, you do what you need to do and then you turn it off. No hacking, no installing, no complex configuration, nothing. It just works.

However, the knowledge regarding IT/computers/devices of those people vary from none to I-could-write-my-own-OS. Those, who really know what they’re doing won’t jail-break their devices or if they will, they’re being kind-number-two. Those who don’t really know but hear from all kind of people (kind-number-one mostly) what cool things would be possible if they’d jail-break their devices, will also jail-break their devices one way or the other. And here the controversiality begins.

Why would someone want to spend the amount of $X on a device that’s totally managed, works exactly as it should and gives you only a number features, which therefor really work and then take highly experimental and nearly unsupported software, put it on exactly this device and try to do things with it that were never be planned to be done with that device.

Those people then realize, how crappy everything started to be, though their devices has an enhanced set of features now. They’re going to be yelling about everything that goes wrong and isn’t working out in a way you’d expect it from an Apple product – but they forget, that it’s not an Apple product anymore. At least not the software. Not all of it.

However, the same thing happens to people of kind-number-one, though the difference is, that those would never complain about their crappy set of new features in public.

Anyway, so as I said, I’m just restoring from the jail-break to Apple’s original. Not that I’m complaining or just tried to be “cool” – I was really interested on two things: First, if I manage it to jail-break it through a Windows XP VM and second, how the jail-breaking stuff evolved till now. I was really curious about the software available for the hacked firmware and the things you could do with it.

Unfortunately it’s still exactly as I thought: It’s nice to play around with, but it’s nothing for a productive, everyday use. The software is too unstable, too untested and totally hacked-together. The programmers didn’t follow any design- or usability-guidelines and in general everything looks too unstable. Don’t get me wrong: I’m not saying that the people who’ve realized this did crap! I admire any hacker who’s contributing to this project. But that’s the exact point of it: Those are usually hackers/developers/freaks who don’t really care about usability-guidelines or stuff like that. Just like those people that were developing UIs for Linux once (and still are).

However, besides this, I didn’t really benefit of the jail-break. I used a cool theme, though my whole iPod got awfully slow because of that. As it seems, the original theme won’t be replaced by a new one, but instead it will be just “overlaid”. At least this was my impression when opening the Preferences, seeing the iPod’s standard theme, waiting some seconds for the iPod to become responsive again and then seeing the modified theme. And this of course also impacted on my battery life: By just listening to music I usually got 3 days of battery-life – and I listen a lot to music! With the jail-break installed, after one day I usually only had twenty-five percent of the battery-life left.

Eh, well. I played a bit around, I’ve seen the jail-break myself and I’ve also seen that it’s far from being called “oh this could really make me use it!“, at least by me. Oh, I guess my recovery has finished….

Anyway, after that, I wanted to take a look at the Reader Zinio provides for the Mac desktop, so I just downloaded and installed it. Before the installation finished, I had to enter my account info (e-mail, password) and so I did. Unfortunately, the Zinio Reader tried to connect but failed, because of my e-mail address seemed not to be existing. I tried it a few times and checked it for typos, but everything was correctly entered.

I decided to write an e-mail to Zinio’s support. I mentioned the problems I’ve been having with the Reader and also the odd, spanish confirmation e-mail I got. Yet (after over one day), they did not answer my mail and I’m wondering whether they’re going to. I’ll just be patient.

However, does anyone know any other sites that provide the same service Zinio does? And maybe allow me to download the stuff I buy as PDF to save it on my Mac?